Skip to main content
AK
10,098
PAGA notices filed in California in 2025 — a record high

Arthur
Karadzhyan

Employment Defense Attorney · California
Defending employers in PAGA representative actions, wage-and-hour class actions, workplace investigations, and complex employment litigation across California.
ANALYTICAL PLATFORM · 8 INTERACTIVE TOOLS · 12 PUBLICATIONS · 12 CASE LAW ANALYSES · 6 INDUSTRY PROFILES
0
PAGA Notices Filed in California (2025)
0%
Maximum Penalty Reduction Under Reforms
0
Days — Shortest Deadline After Notice
0
Supreme Court PAGA Cases Pending
DIR PAGA Filing Data · LWDA Initial Statement of Reasons (Feb. 2026) · AB 2288 / SB 92
01

About

Most PAGA defense is reactive. A notice arrives, counsel answers, discovery happens, and someone negotiates a number at mediation. The exposure model — if one exists — is a back-of-the-envelope calculation based on blanket assumptions. The result: settlements driven by plaintiff's framing, not by the actual data.

I do it differently. Every matter starts with a quantitative exposure model that disaggregates penalties by violation category, applies per-category violation rates derived from actual time records and payroll data, strips non-recoverable categories under the ZB, N.A. and Kirby frameworks, and produces three scenarios — plaintiff maximum, data-driven realistic, and defense best case.

"Among the strongest declarations I have reviewed in my career."
Mediator — Former Plaintiff's Wage-and-Hour Attorney

I built this practice on the plaintiff side — litigating wage-and-hour class actions on behalf of employees before transitioning to defense. That foundation isn't background. It's the operating system. I evaluate claims the way opposing counsel evaluates them, anticipate certification arguments before they're filed, and identify the pressure points that actually move mediations.

The eight interactive tools, twelve publications, and twelve case law analyses on this site aren't marketing. They are the methodology, made visible. The 2024 PAGA reforms created the most significant shift in defense strategy since the statute's enactment — and no published appellate decision has yet interpreted the reform provisions. The analytical frameworks being built right now will define the landscape when that authority arrives.

Focus

PAGA penalty exposure modeling
Wage-and-hour class certification opposition
2024 reform strategy (AB 2288 / SB 92)
Forensic payroll and regular rate analysis
Carrier-assigned defense and panel work

On This Site

8
Tools
12
Publications
12
Case Analyses
6
Industries

Admissions

State Bar of California (No. 353639)
U.S.D.C. Central District of California
U.S.D.C. Northern District of California
U.S.D.C. Eastern District of California
U.S.D.C. Southern District of California
02

Practice Areas

Five practice areas. One through-line: every defense is built on the data, not around it.
Plaintiff-side experience informs every strategic decision — from how certification motions are constructed to how mediations are priced. The tools, publications, and case analyses on this site are the working methodology.
PAGA Representative Actions
Full-lifecycle defense from LWDA notice through resolution.
Exposure Modeling
Three-scenario output with per-category violation rates, penalty stacking, and temporal bifurcation.
Penalty Caps
Pre-notice documentation for the 15% cap, post-notice remediation within 60 days for the 30% cap.
Standing & Scope
Reformed personal-experience requirement (§ 2699(c)). Manageability limitation under Estrada and § 2699(p).
Arbitration
Individual-claim arbitration under Adolph with stay of representative claims. Hohenshelt fee compliance.
Forensic Analysis
Regular rate errors (Alvarado, Ferra), commission timing (Sciborski), derivative cascades (§ 226, § 203, § 210).
Settlement
Moniz framework with preemptive Kullar treatment. Cure proposals for employers under 100 employees.
Wage-and-Hour Class Actions
Certification opposition through trial plan challenges.
Certification
Predominance failures, individualized proof requirements, Duran-compliant sampling methodology challenges.
Class Definition
Identifying overbroad definitions sweeping in exempt employees, multi-location workforces, or different job classifications.
Merits Defense
Meal/rest under Brinker and Donohue, overtime and regular rate, off-the-clock, expense reimbursement, wage statements.
Dual-Track
Coordinating PAGA and class defense — defeating certification narrows the PAGA case and drives the mediation calculus.
Workplace Investigations
Fact-finding for harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and policy violation complaints.
Witness Protocols
Structured interviews with credibility assessment — demeanor analysis, consistency mapping, corroboration tracking.
Reporting
Defensible reports calibrated for board, C-suite, and carrier audiences. Privileged structures under attorney-client and work-product doctrines.
Remediation
Post-investigation remediation planning and facilitated mediation for disrupted workplace relationships.
Employment Counseling & Compliance
Pre-litigation compliance infrastructure designed for penalty cap qualification.
Penalty Cap Positioning
Handbook drafting, supervisor training, payroll audits, and attestation systems — all documented for 15% cap evidence.
AWS Implementation
Four-step DIR election process. One missed step retroactively converts every 10-hour day into daily overtime.
Commission Plans
Sciborski forfeiture exposure analysis and § 2751 written-agreement compliance.
Regular Rate Audits
Overtime and premium accuracy across all compensation components — commissions, bonuses, piece-rate, differentials.
Single-Plaintiff Litigation
FEHA defense and individual Labor Code claims.
FEHA Defense
Disability discrimination, accommodation, interactive process failures, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination.
Misclassification
Independent contractor analysis under the ABC test (Dynamex) and Borello multi-factor framework.
Early Resolution
Pre-litigation demand evaluation, strategic assessment, and early resolution positioning.
03

Tools

Eight tools. Each one models a specific dimension of PAGA exposure that carriers, mediators, and opposing counsel encounter in every case.
All calculations run in your browser. No data is transmitted or stored. Inputs are illustrative defaults — adjust to your matter.
Received a notice?
5–8 questions → strategic recommendation with citations
Interactive · Combined Exposure Estimator
Dual-track model: PAGA penalties + class action damages. Per-category violation rates, penalty cap integration, derivative stacking, and temporal bifurcation.
Post-Reform (June 19, 2024+)
$100 default penalty. $200 only for malicious/oppressive conduct or prior findings. Anti-stacking (§ 2699(i)). Penalty caps available.
Aggrieved Employees
50
Pay Periods (1-Year PAGA Lookback)
26 bi-weekly
Violation Categories · Per-Category Violation Rates
Meal Period
§ 226.7 · $100 (default)
35%
$45,500
Rest Period
§ 226.7 · $100 (default)
30%
$39,000
Wage Statement
§ 226(e) · $100 (specific)
Overtime / Regular Rate
§ 510 · $100 (default)
Expense Reimbursement
§ 2802 · $100 (default)
Minimum Wage
§ 1197.1 · $250 (specific)
Final Pay Timing
§ 203 · $100 (default)
Penalty Cap (§§ 2699(g), 2699(h))
Naranjo Derivative Stacking (limited by § 2699(i))
Pre/Post Compliance Split
Class Action Damages Track
Weekly Pay Period (§ 2699(o))
Plaintiff Maximum
$84,500
Data-Driven Realistic
$50,700
Defense Best Case
$12,675
Penalty Breakdown
Meal Period (§ 226.7) · 35% violation rate
$45,500
Rest Period (§ 226.7) · 30% violation rate
$39,000
Total Exposure
$84,500
Settlement Distribution (Post-Reform: 35% Employee / 65% LWDA)
Employee Share (35%)
$29,575
LWDA Share (65%)
$54,925
Attorney Fees (est. 33%)
$9,760
Read the AnalysisThe "Two Hotels" Framework: Temporal Bifurcation in PAGA Penalty Analysis →
For illustrative purposes only. Actual exposure depends on facts, evidence, and applicable defenses. Post-reform (June 19, 2024+): default penalty $100/employee/pay period (§ 2699(f)(2)(A)); $200 only for malicious/oppressive conduct or prior findings (§ 2699(f)(2)(B)). Penalty caps: 15% (§ 2699(g)(1)); 30% (§ 2699(h)(1)). Anti-stacking: § 2699(i). Weekly halving: § 2699(o). PAGA employee share: 35% (§ 2699(m)). Derivative stacking per Naranjo v. Spectrum Security (2022) 13 Cal.5th 93, limited post-reform by § 2699(i). "Two Hotels" temporal bifurcation is an analytical methodology, not a statutory framework. Class damages estimates are illustrative — actual damages require forensic payroll analysis.
04

Insights & Publications

Click any publication to read the full analysis.

05

Industry Intelligence

Every industry has a structural vulnerability that generic defense strategies miss.
Hospitality runs on tip credits and 24/7 scheduling. Automotive lives and dies by commission forfeiture timing. Healthcare staffing operates across immune government worksites where the staffing firm cannot control the conditions generating the violations. The defense that works for one will fail for another — and the penalty exposure structure is different in each.
6
Industries
42
Exposure Categories
18
Governing Authorities
12
Defense Strategies
Why Industry-Specific Analysis
These six industries are not marketing categories. They represent structurally distinct PAGA and class action exposure profiles driven by differences in applicable wage orders, exemption frameworks, compensation structures, and operational patterns. A hospitality employer operating under Wage Order 5 with tipped employees and 24/7 scheduling faces a fundamentally different compliance landscape than an automotive dealership operating under Wage Order 7 with commissioned salespeople and flat-rate technicians.
Generic defense strategies that apply the same analytical framework across industries miss the structural vulnerabilities unique to each sector — the AWS election exposure in solar, the commission forfeiture pattern in automotive, the multi-worksite manageability challenge in staffing, the piece-rate legacy compliance gap in agriculture. Each industry profile maps the specific violation categories, governing authorities, and defense methodologies that apply to that sector's distinct exposure structure.
Stay Current
These tools and publications are updated as new appellate authority develops. New decisions, reform developments, and analytical tools.
06

Case Law Laboratory

Twelve decisions. Each one changed how PAGA defense is practiced.
From Kirby's foundational distinction between wages and penalties, through Naranjo's derivative cascade that turns one meal violation into four penalty streams, to Hohenshelt's equitable rescue of late arbitration payments that reversed five years of strict-liability authority. The holdings are the floor. The defense strategy built on each holding is what moves mediations.
Currently Monitoring
Leeper v. Shipt, Inc. (S289305)PENDING
Whether headless PAGA claims are permitted. Will determine whether Viking River’s arbitration framework can be circumvented through strategic claim abandonment.
Camp v. Home Depot U.S.A. (S277518)PENDING
Whether time rounding in general timekeeping violates the Labor Code after Donohue eliminated rounding for meal periods.
Prime Healthcare Mgmt. v. Superior CourtPENDING
Whether an arbitrator’s finding of no individual injury eliminates standing for representative PAGA claims.
LWDA Proposed RegulationsTRACKING
First-ever formal PAGA regulations published Feb. 2026. High-frequency filer framework, vexatious filer designation, cure conference procedures, settlement reporting.
Reform Appellate AuthorityTRACKING
No published decision has yet interpreted the 2024 reform provisions. The first decisions will define the defense landscape.
Hohenshelt ProgenyTRACKING
Post-Hohenshelt decisions on the willful/grossly negligent/fraudulent standard. Wilson (2025) excused a one-business-day delay. Colon-Perez excused six days during a natural disaster.
Headless PAGA in Lower CourtsTRACKING
Pending Leeper, trial courts are splitting. CRST Expedited permitted broad claims; Rodriguez v. Lawrence Equipment found standing eliminated.
PAGA Settlement OversightTRACKING
Proposed regulations would require 45-day LWDA review of settlements with authority to object or intervene.
07

Select Matters

The methodology in practice. Each engagement below produced a specific, identifiable defense outcome.
A novel liability theory the supervising partner had never seen raised. A declaration a mediator described as among the strongest in his career. A forensic analysis that reduced claimed exposure by more than 60%. A client who requested the carrier transfer the next matter to maintain the working relationship. Click to expand.
08

Background

I started on the plaintiff side — litigating wage-and-hour class actions at a Los Angeles firm that prosecuted meal-and-rest, overtime, and off-the-clock claims against mid-market and enterprise employers. I learned how plaintiff's counsel evaluates cases, prices risk, builds class certification motions, and approaches mediation. That perspective is now the foundation of every defense strategy I construct.

The transition to defense was deliberate. At a global litigation firm's employment practice group, I handled PAGA and wage-and-hour matters with a level of independence unusual for my seniority — building the quantitative exposure models, novel defense theories, and sampling methodologies that became standard analytical tools across the practice group. The "Two Hotels" temporal bifurcation framework, the 174-question expert deposition outline, the three-scenario penalty model — each originated from the recognition that PAGA defense requires a different kind of rigor than most employment litigation. The work drew attention: a mediator described one declaration as among the strongest he'd reviewed in his career; a client's executive requested that the carrier transfer new matters to maintain the working relationship; a partner noted that a novel liability theory I'd identified had never been raised in his decades of practice.

Earlier, I practiced intellectual property at a boutique firm — researching cutting-edge trademark and licensing issues, drafting prosecution briefs, and producing the kind of deep analytical writing that a transactional IP practice demands. That training in rigorous research, synthesis, and contractual precision translates directly to the work I do now: commission plan analysis, arbitration agreement drafting, and the statutory interpretation that PAGA defense requires.

The thread across all of it: I treat every legal problem as a system to be understood completely before a position is taken. The publications, case law analyses, and interactive tools on this site are not marketing — they are the methodology, made visible.

Education

Pepperdine University School of Law

Juris Doctor

Full-Tuition Dean's Merit Scholarship · Dean's Honor List (Top 15%)

University of California, Berkeley

Bachelor of Arts

Graduated with Honors · Dean's Honors List (Top 4%, College of Letters & Science)

Admissions

  • State Bar of California (No. 353639)
  • U.S.D.C. Central District of California
  • U.S.D.C. Northern District of California
  • U.S.D.C. Eastern District of California
  • U.S.D.C. Southern District of California

Practice Trajectory

Transactional IP (trademark prosecution, licensing) → Plaintiff-side wage-and-hour class actions → Employment defense (PAGA, class actions, investigations, counseling)

09

Resources

Operational tools and reference materials for California employment defense.

PAGA Notice Response Checklist
The First 72 Hours
Five-phase action plan from Day 1 through post-65-day litigation preparation. Matter information sheet, remediation plan structure, carrier notification guide, and key authorities appendix.
Penalty Cap Qualification Tracker
§§ 2699(g) and 2699(h) Documentation
Two-track checklist for the 15% and 30% caps with statutory citations. Common documentation failures, 10-tab evidence assembly guide, and dollar-impact worksheet.
Pre-PAGA Compliance Audit
Self-Assessment for California Employers
24-item assessment across five compliance categories with three industry-specific addenda. Scored output with remediation priority matrix and 90-day implementation timeline.
Three-Scenario Exposure Template
Carrier-Ready Reporting Format
Structured template for presenting plaintiff maximum, data-driven realistic, and defense best case scenarios. Per-category breakdown, penalty cap impact analysis, and settlement authority format.
Cure Proposal Framework
Employers Under 100 Employees
Step-by-step guide to the 33-day cure proposal process under § 2699.3. Sample proposal structure, LWDA filing procedures, cure conference preparation, and post-cure documentation.
Regular Rate Audit Worksheet
Ferra and Alvarado Exposure
Calculating correct regular rates across compensation types — commissions, flat-sum bonuses, piece-rate, shift differentials. Side-by-side comparison with per-employee underpayment quantification.
Derivative Cascade Reference
Naranjo Stacking — Pre- and Post-Reform
Visual reference mapping how a single meal period violation generates up to four penalty streams. Pre-reform full cascade and post-reform § 2699(i) anti-stacking limitations.
Arbitration Agreement Checklist
Post-Adolph, Post-Hohenshelt
14-point review protocol. PAGA splitting provision analysis, poison pill identification, Iskanian waiver check, fee payment compliance, and Hohenshelt-responsive language.
Wage Statement Compliance Matrix
Nine Elements of § 226(a)
Element-by-element compliance guide with common deficiency patterns, risk ratings, Naranjo derivative exposure, and remediation steps including post-Ferra regular rate display requirements.
Mediation Preparation Guide
From Exposure Model to Settlement Authority
Three-scenario exposure presentation, penalty cap documentation package assembly, plaintiff demand rebuttal framework, carrier authority recommendation format, and Moniz requirements.
Early Evaluation Conference Playbook
Maximizing § 2699.3(f)
Strategic guide to the post-reform EEC process. Confidential statement drafting, cure identification strategy, neutral evaluator preparation, and post-conference positioning.
2024 Reform Quick Reference
AB 2288 / SB 92 — Defense Provisions
Single-page reference covering penalty caps (§§ 2699(g)-(h)), anti-stacking (§ 2699(i)), standing (§ 2699(c)(1)), manageability (§ 2699(p)), reduced penalties, weekly halving (§ 2699(o)), and cure procedures.
Carrier Status Report Template
First 30 Days After Notice
Structured format for the initial carrier report: matter summary, three-scenario exposure analysis, defense strategy recommendation, litigation budget estimate, and early resolution assessment.
Expert Deposition Framework
Statistical Sampling Challenges
Six-domain deposition outline targeting plaintiff's sampling expert: population definition, sample selection, violation definition, paid premiums, confidence intervals, and affirmative defense accommodation.
Commission Plan Audit Checklist
Sciborski Forfeiture and § 2751 Compliance
Timing analysis framework for commission payment structures. Identifies forfeiture exposure for departed employees with pending deals, § 2751 written agreement requirements, and regular rate inclusion methodology.
Manageability Motion Framework
Scope Limitation Under § 2699(p) and Estrada
Template for pre-trial manageability motions. Multi-worksite analysis, job classification variation mapping, individualized proof identification, and scope limitation order language.
Contact to request any of these resources.
The analysis
starts here.
Available for referrals, co-counsel arrangements, carrier-assigned defense, workplace investigations, and compliance advisory across California.
Time-Sensitive
If you've received a PAGA notice, the 33-day cure proposal submission window for employers under 100 employees may already be running. The 60-day remediation window for penalty cap qualification (§ 2699(h)(1)) starts when you receive the notice.

Email

arthur.karadzhyan@gmail.com

Phone

(818) 421-8324

Location

Los Angeles, California

Bar Number

State Bar of California, No. 353639

LinkedIn

linkedin.com/in/karadzhyan

What Happens When You Call
Call
Scope & deadlines
24 hrs
Preliminary assessment
48 hrs
Action plan with citations
2 wks
Carrier status report
For Carriers
Available for panel assignments across California. EPLI defense experience spanning hospitality, automotive, healthcare staffing, solar, technology, and retail industries. Conflict check turnaround: 48 hours.
14 days
Three-scenario exposure report
30 days
Carrier status report with authority recommendation
Ongoing
Quarterly status updates with budget tracking
Tools and publications updated as new authority develops.
© 2026 Arthur Karadzhyan · Los Angeles, California
Attorney Advertising · Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome · This website does not constitute legal advice · Privacy & Terms
No information submitted through this website is stored or shared. Contact information is used solely to respond to inquiries. Professional liability insurance status available upon request.